AI Scientist-v2 от Sakana (первую версию упоминали тут) создал статью, которая прошла пир ревью на воркшоп ICLR. https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist-first-publication/ We looked at the generated papers and submitted those we thought were the top 3 (factoring in diversity and quality—We conducted our own detailed analysis of the 3 papers, please read on in our analysis section). Of the 3 papers submitted, two papers did not meet the bar for acceptance. One paper received an average score of 6.25, ranking approximately 45% of all submissions. These scores are higher than many other accepted human-written papers at the workshop, placing the paper above the average acceptance threshold. Specifically, the scores were: * Rating: 6: Marginally above acceptance threshold * Rating: 7: Good paper, accept * Rating: 6: Marginally above acceptance threshold * Rating: 6: Marginally above acceptance threshold Ну, можно ~~было~~ смеяться над ошибками и косяками ранних моделей, можно и продолжать это делать, но тренд неостановим.